SQYX Petition To EIIR Canada In Brief : Land Title Parmountcy Dispute & Fundamental Equality Before The Law : Customary Law

EIIR LETTERS PATENT ENSURING STATE FUNDED ADEQUATE COMPETENT LEGAL COUNSEL OF CHOICE TO GOODWIN SQYX
re
LSBC CRIMINAL CONTEMPT COMPLAINT AGAINST GOODWIN SQYX SCBC DECEMBER 2015 TRIAL DATE
re
LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, BC
$40 MILLION COST OF GOODWIN SQYX RESPONSE
RIGHT TO LEGAL COUNSEL : IN FORMA PAUPERIS : EIIR 2005 RESPONSE: CORONATION OATH : DUTY OF CARE
DEAR EIIR CANADA
Shqwi'qwal Ralph Charles Yuxwuletun Goodwin requires the immediate attendance of EIIR Canada on the matter of contributing adequate nation state funding for the Goodwin SQYX (hereafter, SQYX) competent legal counsel of choice regarding attending the December 2015 SCBC trial on the LSBC complaint that SQYX is in criminal breach of the SCBC Greyell, J. Case S67804 decision 2013; wherein SQYX is restrained from offering, publishing or promoting any materials that may be reasonably determined to be legal advice in contravention of the Legal Profession Act, BC. 

SQYX has appealed this 2013 Greyell, J. decision to the UN Security Counsel per the UN Charter, Chapter VII; naming EIIR Canada as being in breach through hostile, illicit military occupancy; as evidence through historical and current  documentation existing in the public domain - including the Canada TRC. This matter has been copied forward to the information of the EUCHR / UNHRC and the IACHR.

The continued LSBC complaints to the SCBC - and, considering the transcript from the SCBC Case S67804 illustrating alleged breaches of customary and international laws re SQYX civil, political and human rights - have imperiled SQYX in view of the LSBC petitioned criminal contempt complaint on a matter of administrative law dispute, where SQYX has provided pro bono advocacy to in forma pauperis native peoples (CSSP); in particular regarding land title disputes with EIIR Canada.

SQYX has determined that his individual case possesses the critical ingredients through which to establish a lasting and equitable modern era relationship between CSSP and EIIR Canada.

Additionally, regarding his personal safety, SQYX reports that in a previous land title CSSP versus EIIR Canada dispute, EIIR Canada dispatched an RCMP constable to arrest SQYX who was the under code of conduct review for alleged excessive use of a taser upon an 18 year old. The Crown stayed the SQYX case following the fingerprinting.

The merits of this LSBC SCBC case have been reported to the ICC (International Criminal Court) Prosecutor's Office.


SUMMATION

The $40 Million SQYX petition to EIIR Canada requires the positive response forthwith (prior to November 25th, 2015) through immediate communication by (1) Telephone SQYX with confirmation to proceed to issue a standing adequate funding letters patent warrant; (2) EIIR Canada shall confirm that this said funding provision shall establish the SQYX ability to retain the adequate competent legal counsel of choice to respond to the LSBC 2015 criminal conspiracy complaint to the SCBC; and, finally, (3) this said funding shall include adequate SQYX representation to the UNSC and UN Credentials Committee on  the  SQYX v EIIR Canada land titles dispute; and, the SQYX Complaint to the ICC regarding the Canada Crimes Against Humanity And War Crimes Act in matters arising through the SQYX files and other relevant complaints, including, but not limited  to those arising from surviving victims of Indian Residential and Day Schools - modern era issues being the CSSP incarceration ratios; continued seizures of CSSP children into care; and, the continued EIIR Canada conspiracies to deny CSSP citizenry land title rights.
Addendum : (1) In the event that the SQYX argument in the land title dispute with EIIR Canada regarding paramount jurisdiction of the Legal Profession Act, BC fails at a court of competent jurisdiction; then, SQYX proposes that the original LSBC claim fails by fact and law within EIIR Canada governance; per case law. (2) Historically, native First Nations (CSSP) land title claims disputes take 20- 30 years, require $ 30- 40 million; and, when decided in favour of the claimant CSSP then EIIR Canada simply ignores the SCC decision. (3) Success of the SQYX response to the LSBC claim will assist the 60,000 Indian Day School Victims to proceed with their 2009 Joan Jack $15 Billion Class Claim; and, will further provide the legal impetus to find a fair settlement in the claim that the 1900 Canadian lawyers who represented the Indian Residential School Victim Survivors and their estates in recovering the circa 43% legal fees collected while these same lawyers apparently claimed and received EIIR Canada funding; while, lastly it is reported that there were lawyers who also demanded and received art works from these IRSSVs.

ADDENDUM INFORMATION CSSP SOVEREIGN STATE BULLETINS

 
FREE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT